Leader’s style in leading are varied. Basically as far as the classical view of leadership style is concerned, a leader’s style can either be democratic or autocratic. However, it is almost impossible to come up with a collectively agreeable conclusion of what a prime minister leadership style really is.However, it is almost impossible to come up with a collectively agreeable conclusion of what a prime minister leadership style really is. First, leadership in general is often associated with conflict. One person’s ideas and plans are put into collective action by a group or groups of people of which that one person had, in some way or another, managed to convince.
Leadership, in this instance, is looked at how abstracts are put into concrete actions. It displays the ability of an individual to influence, motivate, and enable others to contribute (House, 2004:15). Therefore, in one sense, ideally, leadership is best defined by those who are directly involved in the whole process of achieving specific tasks that has been set out by individual or individuals on behalf of the institution or organisations. The leadership style of a leader, then, is rests upon the followers to determine. However, this should not prevent people outside the setting from making their own interpretations and conclusions. Secondly, leadership is basically all about relationship, i.e.
leader-follower relations in a specific setting, and under various situations. It is an abstract term. In other word”s, leadership is a process, not a personality (Ismail, 1999:5). Basically, the connection between the leader and his followers is governed by a set of norms and rules, depending on the source of power that generates authority.
Position and title – whether formal or informal, official or inofficial – for instance, emphasise authority. Thus, it all boils down to the followers acceptance of the